Skip to main content

Adverse Possession

ad-VERS puh-ZESH-un Latin 'adversus' meaning 'against' and 'possessio' meaning 'possession'; signifying possession contrary to the true owner's rights

Definition

A legal doctrine by which a person who possesses property without the owner's permission for a statutory period acquires title to that property.

Detailed Explanation

Adverse possession is a mode of acquiring title to property by continuous, hostile, open, and uninterrupted possession for the period prescribed by law. In India, the limitation period for acquiring title by adverse possession is 12 years for private property (Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963) and 30 years for government property (Article 112).

The essential requirements are: (1) The possession must be actual and exclusive; (2) It must be open and notorious (not secretive); (3) It must be hostile/adverse to the true owner (animo domini); (4) It must be continuous and uninterrupted for the statutory period; and (5) The possessor must claim the property as their own. The burden of proving all these elements lies on the person claiming adverse possession.

The doctrine has faced criticism for rewarding dishonest occupation, and the Supreme Court has called for its reconsideration. However, it remains part of Indian law. Once the limitation period expires, the true owner's title is extinguished under Section 27 of the Limitation Act, and the adverse possessor acquires a new title. Mere long possession without hostile animus does not constitute adverse possession.

Essential Elements

  • 1 Possession must be actual, physical, and exclusive
  • 2 Possession must be open, visible, and notorious
  • 3 Possession must be hostile and adverse to true owner
  • 4 Possession must be continuous and uninterrupted
  • 5 Possession must continue for the prescribed period (12/30 years)
  • 6 Possessor must claim property as their own (animus possidendi)

Leading Cases

Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Government of India

2004

(2004) 10 SCC 779

Relevance: Supreme Court criticized the doctrine and called for statutory reconsideration

Hemaji Waghaji Jat v. Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan

2009

(2009) 16 SCC 517

Relevance: Reiterated criticism of adverse possession as a law that rewards dishonesty

P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy v. Revamma

2007

(2007) 6 SCC 59

Relevance: Detailed exposition of requirements for adverse possession claim

Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur

2019

(2019) 8 SCC 729

Relevance: Explained the starting point of limitation for adverse possession claims

Usage Example

"The defendant claimed title by adverse possession, asserting that he had been in open and continuous possession of the land for over 15 years, hostile to the original owner's interest."

Synonyms

possessory title title by prescription squatter's rights
AI Case Search

Find How "Adverse Possession" Is Applied

Search through thousands of Supreme Court and High Court judgments to see how this term is applied in actual cases.

Search in LexGyan