Article 14 - Right to Equality
Definition
Detailed Explanation
Article 14 embodies the principle of equality, which is the cornerstone of a democratic republic. It contains two distinct but interrelated concepts borrowed from British and American jurisprudence:
Text of Article 14: "The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India."
Two Concepts in Article 14:
1. Equality Before the Law (British Concept): - Derived from the Rule of Law (Dicey) - Negative concept - absence of special privilege - No one is above the law - Equal subjection of all to ordinary law - Exceptions: President, Governors (Article 361), diplomatic immunity
2. Equal Protection of the Laws (American Concept): - Positive concept - equal treatment in equal circumstances - Allows reasonable classification - Requires similar treatment for persons similarly situated - Permits affirmative action for disadvantaged groups
Reasonable Classification Test: The State can treat different classes differently if: (a) The classification is based on intelligible differentia (distinguishing factors) (b) The differentia has a rational nexus with the object of the law
New Doctrine of Arbitrariness: E.P. Royappa (1974) introduced a new dimension: Article 14 strikes at arbitrariness because arbitrariness is antithetical to equality. Even if a law passes the reasonable classification test, it can be struck down if it is arbitrary, unreasonable, or lacks any rational basis.
Article 14 applies to all persons (including non-citizens and legal entities), not just citizens, and prohibits discrimination by the State in all its actions.
Essential Elements
- 1 Guarantees equality before law and equal protection of laws
- 2 Available to all persons including non-citizens and corporations
- 3 Permits reasonable classification with intelligible differentia
- 4 Classification must have rational nexus with law's objective
- 5 Prohibits arbitrariness in State action
- 6 Does not prohibit special provisions for women, children, backward classes
- 7 Read with Articles 15, 16, 17, and 18 for comprehensive equality framework
Leading Cases
State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar
1952AIR 1952 SC 75
Relevance: Established the reasonable classification test under Article 14
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
1974(1974) 4 SCC 3
Relevance: Introduced the doctrine of arbitrariness - equality is antithesis of arbitrariness
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
1978(1978) 1 SCC 248
Relevance: Article 14 applies to procedure - must be fair, just, and reasonable
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib
1981(1981) 1 SCC 722
Relevance: Rule of law and Article 14 pervade all governmental actions
Shayara Bano v. Union of India
2017(2017) 9 SCC 1
Relevance: Applied arbitrariness doctrine to strike down triple talaq
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
2018(2018) 10 SCC 1
Relevance: Decriminalized homosexuality; Section 377 violated Article 14's equality guarantee
Usage Example
"The Supreme Court struck down the discriminatory provision as violative of Article 14, holding that the classification had no rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved."
Synonyms
See Also
Find How "Article 14 - Right to Equality" Is Applied
Search through thousands of Supreme Court and High Court judgments to see how this term is applied in actual cases.
Search in LexGyan