Skip to main content

Writ Petition

rit puh-TI-shun From Old English 'writ' (written order) via Latin 'breve' (short writing); inherited from English common law tradition

Definition

A formal written application to the Supreme Court under Article 32 or High Court under Article 226 seeking enforcement of fundamental rights or other legal rights through constitutional writs.

Detailed Explanation

A writ petition is the constitutional mechanism for seeking judicial intervention against violations of fundamental rights or illegal actions by the State. The Constitution of India provides for five types of writs that can be issued by the Supreme Court (Article 32) and High Courts (Article 226).

The five types of writs are:

1. Habeas Corpus (You shall have the body): Issued to produce a detained person before the court to examine the legality of detention. Used against illegal detention or imprisonment.

2. Mandamus (We command): Directs a public authority to perform a public duty. Cannot be issued against private persons or where duty is discretionary.

3. Certiorari (To be certified): Issued to quash orders of lower courts, tribunals, or quasi-judicial authorities that have acted without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice.

4. Prohibition (To forbid): Issued to prevent lower courts or tribunals from exceeding their jurisdiction or acting contrary to law. Issued before proceedings conclude.

5. Quo Warranto (By what authority): Challenges the legality of a person holding a public office. Tests whether the holder has valid authority to occupy the position.

Article 32 is a fundamental right itself (Right to Constitutional Remedies), making the Supreme Court the guarantor of Fundamental Rights. Article 226 confers wider powers on High Courts, allowing writs for enforcement of both fundamental and legal rights.

The distinction: Under Article 32, writs can only be issued for violation of Fundamental Rights; under Article 226, writs can be issued for any legal right including Fundamental Rights.

Essential Elements

  • 1 Must be filed before Supreme Court (Article 32) or High Court (Article 226)
  • 2 Petitioner must establish locus standi or public interest
  • 3 Must show violation of fundamental right (Article 32) or any legal right (Article 226)
  • 4 Alternative remedy doctrine may apply under Article 226
  • 5 Writ must be appropriate for the relief sought
  • 6 State or its instrumentalities (as per Article 12) must be party

Leading Cases

Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras

1950

AIR 1950 SC 124

Relevance: One of the first cases establishing Article 32 as the heart and soul of the Constitution

Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India

1984

(1984) 3 SCC 161

Relevance: Liberalized locus standi for public interest litigation through writ petitions

L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India

1997

(1997) 3 SCC 261

Relevance: Held that writ jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 226 is part of basic structure

Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra

2002

(2002) 4 SCC 388

Relevance: Clarified scope of curative petition and writ jurisdiction

Usage Example

"The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 before the Supreme Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State to implement the minimum wages notification."

Synonyms

constitutional writ prerogative writ Article 32 petition Article 226 petition
AI Case Search

Find How "Writ Petition" Is Applied

Search through thousands of Supreme Court and High Court judgments to see how this term is applied in actual cases.

Search in LexGyan