Skip to main content

Nemo Judex in Causa Sua

NEE-mo JOO-deks in KAW-za SOO-ah Latin: 'no one should be a judge in his own cause'

Definition

A principle of natural justice that prohibits a person from adjudicating a matter in which they have a personal interest, bias, or prejudice.

Detailed Explanation

Nemo judex in causa sua, also known as the rule against bias, is one of the two cardinal principles of natural justice in Indian law. It ensures that justice is not only done but is manifestly seen to be done. The principle requires that the adjudicating authority must be impartial and free from any bias.

Under Indian law, bias can be of several types: pecuniary bias (financial interest in the outcome), personal bias (relationship with parties), subject matter bias (preconceived notions about the issue), and departmental bias (official interest in the outcome). The Supreme Court has held that even a reasonable likelihood or apprehension of bias is sufficient to disqualify a judge or decision-maker.

The principle applies to all judicial, quasi-judicial, and administrative proceedings. An order passed by a biased authority is voidable and can be set aside. The test is whether a reasonable person, aware of the relevant facts, would reasonably apprehend bias. Indian courts have extended this principle to include 'institutional bias' and 'official bias' in administrative matters.

Essential Elements

  • 1 The decision-maker must have no personal interest in the outcome
  • 2 There must be no pecuniary or financial interest, however small
  • 3 No personal relationship with any party that could affect impartiality
  • 4 No predetermined views on the subject matter
  • 5 Reasonable apprehension of bias is sufficient ground for disqualification

Leading Cases

A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India

1970

AIR 1970 SC 150

Relevance: Selection committee member who was also a candidate violated the principle

J. Mohapatra v. State of Orissa

1984

(1984) 4 SCC 103

Relevance: Laid down comprehensive tests for determining bias in administrative proceedings

Mineral Development Ltd. v. State of Bihar

1960

AIR 1960 SC 468

Relevance: Pecuniary interest, however small, disqualifies a judge

Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India

1987

(1987) 4 SCC 611

Relevance: Court-martial proceedings where the same officer who ordered court-martial also confirmed sentence was held vitiated by bias

Usage Example

"The tribunal's order was quashed as the presiding officer had a pecuniary interest in the outcome, violating the principle of nemo judex in causa sua."

Synonyms

rule against bias no one shall be judge in own cause principle of impartiality

Related Terms

AI Case Search

Find How "Nemo Judex in Causa Sua" Is Applied

Search through thousands of Supreme Court and High Court judgments to see how this term is applied in actual cases.

Search in LexGyan